Thursday, March 23, 2017
Julio Fine Arts Gallery #2
Tuesday, March 14, 2017
Data Visualization
The video talked about how people can communicate things quicker through data visualization because our brains can decipher the design. They used and example of a tiger running through the grass. We have the ability to tell the difference between the pattern of the grass and the moving tiger. Our brains are wired this way and we need this skill in order to survive. A concept like this is not common sense. It was very interesting to hear what they had to say. I never really thought about how our brain works when we see these patterns.
Throughout the video they also said that the best and fastest way to change someone's mind or behavior is by showing it visually. This interested me because since my major is speech-language-hearing sciences, we talk a lot about behavior and how to change it. For example, if a child is acting up during a therapy session or if we are working with people who have emotional/behavioral disturbances. I thought it was interesting that they said sometimes visually showing the desired behavior results in the target behavior.
Lastly, they said it's helpful to show something visually that is complex and hard to comprehend. I would have to agree with this statement. I am a visual learner, therefore sometimes in class it's hard to understand a concept unless there are visuals. For example, chemistry is difficult for me. Last year we learned about the electron orbits. This is something that only made sense to me if the teacher drew out each orbit and explained it that way.
Throughout the video they also said that the best and fastest way to change someone's mind or behavior is by showing it visually. This interested me because since my major is speech-language-hearing sciences, we talk a lot about behavior and how to change it. For example, if a child is acting up during a therapy session or if we are working with people who have emotional/behavioral disturbances. I thought it was interesting that they said sometimes visually showing the desired behavior results in the target behavior.
Lastly, they said it's helpful to show something visually that is complex and hard to comprehend. I would have to agree with this statement. I am a visual learner, therefore sometimes in class it's hard to understand a concept unless there are visuals. For example, chemistry is difficult for me. Last year we learned about the electron orbits. This is something that only made sense to me if the teacher drew out each orbit and explained it that way.
Thursday, February 23, 2017
Whitescapes
I placed a paper towel on top of a
shirt that I have. The whites were different, but the picture doesn’t show it
very clearly. In person, the paper towel has a yellow tint while the shirt has
a blue tint. As I notice these colors within the white, it was hard for me to
go back and call this color “white” again.
Changing the lighting in the room
didn’t make much of a difference. The only difference I saw was that the colors were more prominent. I still saw the yellow tint on the paper
towel and the blue tint on the shirt.
Saturday, February 18, 2017
Friday, February 17, 2017
Friday, February 3, 2017
John Berger Insights
1)
“The invention of the camera changed not only
what we see, but how we see it.”
The camera reproduces the picture
in any size, place, or purpose. It can be everywhere and anywhere. The
paintings used to belong to their own space. They were always placed on the
same wall and in the same position. The pictures that were shown in the video
were duplicated. They are now on many different screens surrounded by different
sounds, people, and materials.
This is an interesting idea. It’s
something I never thought of on my own. Yes, the camera duplicates the picture
and even changes the way the picture looks. Reproductions distort the actually
look. We aren’t able to see the brush strokes, or even the exact color that was
being used. However, that’s something I could infer without knowing much about
art. To say that the art has been duplicated and is now “everywhere” is an idea
I would have never thought of on my own.
2)
“Paintings are modified and changed by the
sounds you hear while looking at them.”
This is interesting because I felt
it work when John Berger gave an example. We looked at Van Gogh’s painting in
silence. It seemed to be a nice painting with a calming effect to it. After, he
said that this was Van Gogh’s last painting before passing away and then added
solemn music to it. This gave the painting a completely different feel. This
concept is something one wouldn’t notice while it was happening; it’s something
that needs to be pointed out. This concept is exactly as if you’re watching a
movie, and the music comes on in the background. The music gives the scene more
meaning. If there were scary music playing, it gives it a frightening feel. A
music-less movie means nothing because the music helps give the picture/scene
more meaning.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)